The Cleveland Browns have their fan worried, again. Maybe the right word isn’t “again” but
“still.” And for once it’s not about the
head coach or even the quarterback they still don’t have. It’s about analytics.
Despite about every possible reason why they couldn’t do it,
the Browns did go ahead and hire a credible head coach in Hue Jackson. But the rejiggering of the front office in a
way that doesn’t otherwise exist in the NFL is an understandable cause for
concern. Of the three people most
responsible for setting next year’s roster, two of them have absolutely no
experience at any level, CYO, middle school, high school, college, semi-pro,
pro, flag, evaluating talent. The other
is 28 years old. In a fit of
inspiration, an algorithm will be the chief evaluator. It can’t be worse.
I’m a proponent of analytics. You should be, too. It’s transformed baseball in a way that in
large measure has dulled the impact of simply having the fattest wallet. And while analytics will certainly improve
decision making, the human element can’t be eliminated entirely, particularly
in making player evaluations.
At the professional level, many talent decisions make
themselves. Anybody, including the
person who sees one NBA game every decade can draft LeBron James first. Where the far more difficult decisions came
is in filling out roster behind him. The talent difference between players is
often razor thin with the stats giving no clear winner.
The other thing, of course, is that analytic-driven
decisions often seem to defy logic or at least conventional wisdom, which also makes people worry. Look at what just happened with the Cleveland
Cavaliers.
The firing of head coach David Blatt was driven in large
part by analytics. What worried Griffin
was the statistic he quoted, that since 2000-01 season there have been 50 teams
that have finished with a winning percentage of at least .700 but only 8 of
those teams have won championships. He
feared the Cavs were once again on the same path, based on what he was seeing
in the team’s advanced stats and what he was observing in the locker room. As Griffin said, it seemed to be the least
engaged winning team he’d ever been around.
That may very well be true and that’s the human element to
all this. As good as the Cavs are and
have been, the losses to both San Antonio and particularly to the Golden State
Warriors, while just two of the 82 regular season games the team will play,
told you two things. The first was that
the Cavs still aren’t completely meshing.
The second, quite related and even more telling was that the Spurs and
the Warriors have an “it” factor the Cavs do not. There is something inherent in all great
teams that just doesn’t lie. Even when
the sum of all parts is great, the great teams are still more than the sum of all
those parts. You saw it with the 2014
Ohio State Buckeyes and you see it now with the Warriors. Call it chemistry or black magic. What matters most in team sports is still the
team concept and to Griffin’s eyes and stat sheet at least, the Cavs didn’t
have it and weren’t getting it under Blatt.
The Cavs are all-in on analytics. Now, too, are the Browns. The difference of course is that the Cavs
have the greatest player on the planet.
The Browns don’t have someone in the top 100 of the best players in the
planet, maybe the top 200. They need
more than a good algorithm. To
paraphrase Roy Scheider’s Martin Brody, they’re gonna need a bigger computer.
And if analytics in the hands of really smart people with no
football experience wasn’t enough to spook Browns fans, then owner Jimmy Haslam’s
most recent comments about estranged quarterback Johnny Manziel should make
them petrified because it defies all logic and analytics.
Manziel has mostly been AWOL from the Browns since before
the last game of the season. His bizarre
trip to Las Vegas as his earnest but overmatched teammates played out the
string, his brief visit to the facility afterward and then his party tour in
Texas has been well documented. So, too,
has the fact that Manziel hasn’t reached out to his new head coach nor has the
new head coach reached out to Manziel.
Yet at this week’s Senior Bowl Haslam talked as though the
relationship with Manziel has simply hit a rough patch in the same way a marriage
hits a rough patch, as if divorce is possible but reconciliation more likely. Well, that rough patch just got rougher. Manziel is again under investigation for
domestic violence and irrespective of what the official police report
ultimately concludes I suspect the NFL is going to take this one more seriously
than the last time he got into a public argument with a girlfriend.
Mostly I attribute the talk to Haslam’s ill-conceived
attempt to build value in a player where there is none as a prelude to some
sort of trade. But on the off chance
that Haslam is serious that kind of thinking would qualify him as the biggest lunkhead
to occupy an owner’s box since Ted Stepien.
Manziel is a person with a smattering of NFL skills who lacks both the
maturity and the temperament to ever be anything more than a guy who used to be
somebody in college. And that’s giving
him the benefit of the doubt. More likely
he’s an addict deep within the grips of drugs and booze for whom his first
stint in rehab had no lasting impact. You don’t continue to have the kind of
incidents that surround Manziel without drugs and/or alcohol being at the
center
.
It doesn’t matter, at least to most fans. The Browns aren’t running a social services
agency. The team has invested
significant money and resources in Manziel and all it’s received in return is
the attendant league-wide embarrassment that comes with having made such an
awful choice in drafting him in the first place. There is no set of circumstances, not one,
where Manziel returning to the Browns for another disastrous season makes a
lick of sense to anyone. Stated
differently, if Haslam is serious and ends up hanging on to Manziel it will be
at the expense of undoing whatever good will Haslam’s cultivated this
offseason.
That’s what has me most worried about the Browns’ new
structure. It’s not that there’s
anything theoretically wrong with it. It’s
that the person making the key judgments in putting it together, Haslam, is the
same guy who has botched every other decision he’s made up to this point
regarding the fans.
Cleveland fans will always worry. It’s a comfortable space. They’ve known no real prosperity and when
fleeting victories come they are just often preludes to bigger letdowns. This franchise is finally trying something
different for which there is no downside.
Having escaped the vicious cycle of their previous insanity, however,
doesn’t put them on the right road. It
just puts them on a different road.
Where it leads is anyone’s guess but at least they’ll have a bunch of algorithms
to explain why they got lost this time.