At least Chris Antonetti is polite.
The Cleveland Indians general manager met with the media earlier in
the week to give the typical GM mea culpea that usually follows a
disaster of a season that resulted in someone other than the GM
getting fired. Such is the state of affairs in Cleveland with the
Indians where everything changes and yet remains remarkably the same.
There’s been no rush by anyone to
defend former manager Manny Acta, meaning that no one much is
questioning his firing. But as I recall no one much questioned his
hiring even though he had flamed out in Washington while trying to
guide a talentless roster through turbulent times. Why anyone except
Antonetti and Mark Shapiro and The Dolans thought that Acta would be
any different trying to guide this talentless roster through
turbulent times really tells you pretty much all you need to know
about why things do remain remarkably the same with the Indians
having just experience ANOTHER 90+ loss season.
The players aren’t always the best
guide in determining the effectiveness of their boss so taking their
word on anything is always risky. Especially risky is giving any
weight to anything Chris Perez has to say. I like the fact that he’s
quotable and media friendly and I hope that as long as he remains in
the game he stays exactly that way. But simply because he speaks his
mind shouldn’t be confused in any sense that his comments are
particularly well thought out. Most often they aren’t.
The Indians problems didn’t walk
about the door once Manny Acta was told to gather his personal
belongings and exit stage left, as Perez claimed. The Indians are
being run by the Mad Magzine equivalent of the Usual Gang of Idiots
and their problems really are rooted in incredibly poor
decision-making at these higher levels. Acta had just failed in
almost identical circumstances and here he was now being told to
succeed. Just as Acta, barely breathing, couldn’t yell competence
into players who weren’t, so couldn’t the Gang of Idiots running
the team suddenly turn Acta into a successful manager.
The chain of command that is the
Indians is responsible foremost for the utter disaster of a season.
There’s nothing wrong with living life on a budget and the Oakland
As again proved that good things can come when good decision making
is the skill most valued on a team with limited financial resources.
So in that sense let’s get past the
notion that the Dolans, simply because they lack enough financial
wherewithal to be major league owners, are killing this team in and
of itself through a small budget. More funds would help, but their
far bigger sin given their finances is that they couple it with
incredibly poor decision making.
Why, for example, they wouldn’t hold
either Shapiro or Antonetti or, preferably, both responsible for the
way the season went and simply sacrifice Acta is a question that
hasn’t been answered and probably never will, at least adequately.
The Dolans are the ones that promoted Shapiro even though nothing
about the way he was running the team as general manager suggested
that the promotion was deserved.
You can find individual situations that
worked and even a season or two that went OK under Shapiro but the
evidence against his overall tenure is far more damning. When
Shapiro was promoted to club president the team was in worse shape
from a talent perspective then when he became general manager. It
wasn’t then poised to be competitive and still isn’t. Shapiro is
respected because he’s been around, cleans up nice and is rapid
fire with the kind of buzzwords that often mask actual ability, but
he isn’t respected because he’s accomplished great things. Name
one, just one.
Shapiro, having kept his job, continued
to demonstrate his lack of competence by retaining Antonetti, who was
a bad hire from the outset. Antonetti was basically in charge of the
Indians’ drafting process before taking over as general manager and
of all the weak links in the organization, player development has
been the weakest.
There have been plenty of excuses for
this such as the Indians deliberately avoiding players in the draft
who had signed with certain agents because they knew they couldn’t
meet the agent’s financial demands for the player. But those are
just excuses. Over time, and under Antonetti’s specific direction,
the Indians consistently made the wrong choices in the draft to the
point that there were no viable players they could plug into this
team this season when all the levees around the team failed at the
same time. And let’s face it, the levees all failing at the same
time wasn’t an accident but was the result of maintenance done on
the cheap for years coalescing just as August beckoned.
In his role as general manager,
Antonetti has shown an amazing level of consistency in perpetuating
his bad decisions. I applauded then and still do the idea of the
Ubaldo Jimenez trade because it was bold and the timing was right.
This team needed some boldness. But big risk comes with either big
rewards or big problems. This came with big problems because of
massive misjudgments regarding the players involved in that trade. A
major part of the reason Antonetti makes so much money is precisely
because he is the one that has to take the fall for those decisions.
Then there were the free agent
signings, if you can call them that, of this past season. Everyone
except Antonetti apparently saw them as wrongheaded, at the very
least and that’s what they turned out to be. It’s as if
Antonetti was given $75 and told to buy a enough food to sustain his
family for a week and instead spent $70 of it on lottery tickets and
the other $5 on soda and potato chips. The lottery tickets were all
losers and the soda and potato chips weren’t good for anything more
than a snack and when it was over the fans, as usual, were starving.
This culture of decision making at the
Indians is what is killing this franchise. Whoever the Indians hire
as the next manager, be it Sandy Alomar or Terry Francona, will be
fine in and of itself. Both are qualified, one more so than the
other. But let’s not anyone pretend that it will make a
difference. Antonetti will be making player acquisition and roster
decisions and Shapiro will be doing whatever it is he does and the
Dolans will do whatever it is they do. Until the top of this pyramid
becomes better decision makers this team will continue to the same
path as the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Kansas City Royals.
**
Speaking of decision making, new
Cleveland Browns owner in waiting, Jimmy Haslam III, has let it be
known that no major decisions will get made until after the year is
over. That’s as it should be, of course.
It doesn’t mean that Mike Holmgren
will stick around. He very well could leave of his own accord. But
for those worried that Tom Heckert might leave mid year or those
begging for Pat Shurmur to leave mid year, neither appears likely,
except that I don’t know how even a new owner holds on to Shurmur
if this team doesn’t win a game soon.
I wonder, though, whether Haslam has
seen or will see NFL Films’ latest installment of A Football Life
entitled “Cleveland ’95.” It’s a terrific history lesson on
decision making, taking the long view and making sure an owner
understands his place in the grand scheme of things.
The documentary on the Browns’ 1995
season was fascinating, at the very least. The narrator made the
point early on that if you were there then you can’t forget.
Actually, you can. The overall injustice lingers and should. The
details though got lost to time.
The Browns were 11-5 in 1994 and won a
playoff game under Bill Belichick. The 1994 season had been 3 years
in the making. Art Modell, to his credit, gave Belichick enough
freedom to overhaul the franchise the way he saw fit and Belichick,
to his credit, work tirelessly toward that goal even if he acted like
an asshole publicly while doing so.
The success wasn’t immediate though
in context to Browns 2.0 wasn’t so bad. The team went 6-10 then
7-9 and 7-9 in Belichick’s first three seasons. But anyone
remembering those seasons remembers them mostly for all of the
competitive losses the team piled up, similar to how this current
Browns team piles up competitive losses.
Then it all came together in 1994 and
the Browns really did seem on the precipice. Indeed, the team was
picked as a Super Bowl contender in 1995. After starting off 3-1,
Modell then sabotaged the season by striking a deal with Baltimore to
move the team. The players were every bit as dispirited as the fans.
So were the coaches. And as Belichick says now, with every bit of
sarcasm that only a Browns fan could love, he kept looking around for
help from Modell but he wasn’t to be found. Modell was off in
Baltimore, hiding.
When the wreckage of that season was
completed, the Browns stood at 5-11. And everything that Belichick
had built, and it was formidable, had been mostly wasted when Modell
stupidly fired him.
Modell and his apologists can reinvent
history all they want, but Modell was a terrible decision maker. He
twice fired Hall of Fame coaches and though he ended up with one
Super Bowl it was more the product of a system that Belichick built
in Cleveland that, as Ozzie Newsome admitted in the documentary, he
simply continued in Baltimore. Newsome has been successful in
keeping the Ravens consistently in the contenders conversation but
the team hasn’t nearly reached the heights that Belichick has with
the New England Patriots, a team he rebuilt much like he was
rebuilding the Browns.
The larger point though for Haslam is
that these are lessons in decision making in the context of
professional sports he needs to learn mostly from the way decisions
turn out for those whose processes are flawed. Modell was emotional
and impetuous. He lacked a both a moral center (obviously) and a
fully developed business sense. On the one hand he would give
Belichick the freedom to rebuild which shows a level of understanding
on how it all works but on the other hand even though he could see
the tangible results fired him anyway because Belichick couldn’t
pump air into the balloon that Modell deliberately and irresponsibly
deflated during that '95 season. Then there’s a revealing moment
in the Cleveland ’95 documentary where Newsome recalls that Modell
preferred the Ravens draft a quarterback instead of Jonathan Ogden.
Maybe Modell finally got too tired for the fight but he let Newsome
make the pick the team needed instead of the one Modell wanted and as
a result Ogden stabilized the offensive line like only few others of
that ilk can. Ogden's arrival made a Super Bowl quarterback out of
Trent Dilfer.
Haslam could also learn plenty from how
the Dolans dither over their team. Trust, when the only goal is
stability, isn’t any better formula for success than constantly
changing directions while the game is still being played. I don’t
think that Holmgren and Heckert sink to the level of Shapiro and
Antonetti, but if Haslam stays with them merely for stability and not
for vision, then the mindless, endless wandering through the desert
will continue.
**
With the Cavaliers grinding back to
life, it’s fair to see this upcoming season as a referendum on Dan
Gilbert’s decision making. When LeBron James left town (and, let’s
face it, there was absolutely nothing Gilbert could have done to
change that outcome, not a single thing) Gilbert discovered that the
hole left behind was much larger than it should have been.
Enter Grant. Since taking over Grant
has made a number of moves to try and fill in those gaps. Kyrie
Irving isn’t James but he isn’t Bobby Sura either. The potential
in the moves is promising and while this season isn’t make or break
it will start to form the real foundation of whether the Cavs can get
back to being a top level team in the NBA-mandated 8-10 years of
penance that must be paid during any rebuilding process.
Gilbert is a bold decision maker who
seems to put equal weight on both the process and the outcome. He’ll
give Grant enough rope but he won’t Grant’s loyalty blind him to
Grant’s failures should that be what develops. That’s probably
how it should be.
This Cavs season will be interesting
not from a win/loss standpoint but more from whether or not Grant can
buck the trend of the other GMs in this town who have not been up to
the challenges of their tasks and whether or not Gilbert will have
the patience to even let us find this out. It’s not a sexy outlook
and certainly not one that sells tickets this season but if they get
the balance right, it will sell plenty of tickets eventually.
**
As long as we’re on the topic of both
bad decision making and the Cleveland Indians, this week’s question
to contemplate: Why would anyone renew a season ticket package at
any level with the Indians?
No comments:
Post a Comment